Category: Mutilations

  • 2011: Cattle Mutilation Investigation in Entre Rios Argentina

    2011: Cattle Mutilation Investigation in Entre Rios Argentina


    By Andrea Pérez Simondini, Visión OVNI


    Place: Puerto Curtiembre, Cerritos (Entre Rios)
    Cattleman: José Estrada
    Date of Animal Deaths: 24 June 2011
    Number of Dead Animals: 2
    Animals Witnessed: Male and female, approximately 2 years old.

    Research Team: Oscar Mendoza, Luis Brussa, Ariel Maderna

    The Investigation:
    Given its proximity to the scene of the events, a team was organized on June 29th, formed by Luis Brussa, Oscar Mendoza and Ariel Maderna. We reported quickly to the scene, initially visiting the Sheriff’s Office at Cerrito. Having advised the police of our presence in the area, we were escorted by a unit to the location where the remains of 2 of the 5 animals could be found.

    At the site we were welcomed by Sgt. Juan Ramon Muller of the Puerto Curtiembre barracks, accompanied by cattleman Jose Luis Estrada. We went to inspect the animal remains, which displayed advanced signs of decomposition due to the time that elapsed between the moment we learned of the story and our arrival at the site.

    José Estrada told us that his animals stampeded on the night of the event. He had locked them in a pen, protected by tall poles and wiring, but something or someone had frightened a total of 100 animals, causing them break into a frantic run, bursting through the fencing and entering a narrow trail some 50 meters long that leads into an open field, fleeing in every direction and even crossing three rows of electrified fence. One of the animals fell 1000 meters from the pasture and the second 500 meters ahead, as it sought to find the exit gate.

    So we began by taking photos of the animal remains from several angles while Oscar Mendoza and Luis Brussa made Geiger counter checks to dismiss the possibility of any radioactive traces whatsoever in the area surrounding the animals. This was done pursuant to the hypothesis that the agent of factor behind this mutilation is unknown to man, whether terrestrial or not, and because such alterations had already been reported in the United States.

    The dead animals presented a series of incisions on their left sides, on the front of their heads, with the type of anal damage produced by carrion animals. Their eyes were also missing.

    According to Jose Estrada, the owner of the field, when he found the animals they only presented incisions over the left front shoulder bone, as well as signs of tearing produced by an alleged animal attack. One of them had bites on its muzzle, while another – still alive – showed signs of similar bite marks on the same location.

    This was further confirmed by an examination performed by a veterinarian from the town of Maria Grande, who reported to the scene a few hours after the finds. She had been contacted by the Cerrito police department, as a professional examination is requested after such discoveries are made. The veterinarian made the incisions we can see in the photographs, in an effort to see if any organs or viscera were missing. This veterinarian both specializes in, and has followed, the various animal deaths in Entre Rios, whether mutilated or not.

    We were able to ascertain the deaths of two of the five animals reported in the area. The other three were found in a neighboring field, belonging to Mr. Franco Lorenzutti.
    After being invited by the sergeant back to the Puerto Curtiembre barracks to examine the photos he’d taken the day after the event. While reviewing the images, we were startled by the visibility of the blood spilled in the area where the 5 dead bovines were found. This was presumably the work of some predator between the 18th and the 24th of June. None of these bovines, from what we could see, had been devoured.

    This prompted us to contact veterinarian Gladys Uzman, who conducted the initial work at the site, to glean her first observations. “Out of all the examined animals, and after having made incisions to see if any organs were missing and subsequently thrown out, only torn tissue and muscle was found, as one would expect from a predator attack. Hence the presence of blood at the site. Another animal presented a strong bite on its muzzle, made by some not-very-small animal, which had broken and crushed the bones.

    When asked if she had seen any bite marks on the necks of these animals, the veterinarian said yes, that she had found one such bite on one animal, leading us to suppose that these bovines (all of them calves) had been attacked by a wild feline from the area (the possibility of a puma is not dismissed).

    The puma hypothesis was also mentioned by the veterinarian, as well as the possibility that wild or feral canines had been responsible for the deaths, as these had been seen at the scene of the events in Mr. Lorenzutti’s field, some 15 kilometers distant from Mr. Estrada’s property, according to the police sergeant. Whether the animals displayed bites on their legs has yet to be established. This is where dogs tend to inflict injuries to bring the bovine down and then kill it on the ground. One of the characteristics we have mentioned in the foregoing paragraph is the bite on the upper part of the muzzle, as shown in the photo. This can indeed be done by canines and not by felines, who only eat the flesh. These feral dogs do not belong to any species in particular, but its possible that some larger ones survived, and when they attack, they do so at night and in packs.

    In recent years, the progress of cultivation, particularly soy, due to the extraordinary prices on the international market, led to a clearing of the wilderness to have greater cultivation surfaces. This caused many native wild animals (birds, foxes, felines, hares, guazunchos, etc.) and dogs often abandoned by their owners in the wilderness, to migrate from one field to the next in search of food and shelter.

    Conclusion:

    By looking at these photos, there is no question that these 5 animal deaths were due to the attack of one or more predators migrating through the area.

    The photos display the prints of the assailants. The prints suggest dogs, but there is one in particular that does not match these, and may perhaps be a feline looking for food, which occurs in the winter season when food is at its most scarce. The feline hypothesis would be ascribed to a puma or even a yaguareté.

    The case is not closed, and we shall return in coming days to complement the visit to Mr. Lorenzutti’s field and determine and work on some points with the veterinarian with regard to the most affected areas on the bovines during the attacks, such as the necks and legs. The mystery remains, of course, as the five animals were attacked on the same side (left), 15 km distant from each other and with a week’s difference.

    Translation (c) 2011, S. Corrales. Special thanks to Andrea Pérez Simondini


    SOURCE

  • 2010: Animal mutilations linked to UFOs?

    2010: Animal mutilations linked to UFOs?


    (Last Updated On: February 9, 2018)

    A Walsall man has told BBC WM that aliens and UFOs are responsible for a string of animal attacks in the UK.

    Mike Freebury, a member of the Animal Pathology Field Unit, has investigated the mystery of ”cattle mutilations” for a number of years. The phenomenon, first reported in America in the 1970s, involves the unexplained deaths of rural animals.  The bodies are often discovered with missing limbs and organs, removed with surgical precision. Mike says that the illegal attacks are also happening in Britain – and UFOs are responsible.

    “Certainly, in my opinion, the UFOs are something that relates directly to the animal mutilations,” he told BBC WM presenter Brett Birks. “They”re often seen around the areas where mutilations are taking place. I think that the animal mutilations are possibly some sort of sampling programme being carried out by the entities that are propelling these crafts.”

    APFU

    Mike is part of the Animal Pathology Field Unit (APFU), an organisation dedicated to researching animal mutilation in the UK. “We have carried out a number of surveillances on Dartmoor,” he said. “We were never able to catch the perpetrators in the act but we have seen some very strange craft of unknown origin. UFOs. We have them on film. We’ve managed to get frame-by-frame analysis of them done. It appears that these things were appearing literally within a second and then gone.”

    British attacks

    In rural Britain, dead sheep are being found by farmers with mysterious – and gruesome – injuries. Mike says a “highly active” area in the UK includes Shrewsbury, Dartmouth and parts of Wales. “We”re talking about some fairly remote areas,” he said “These injuries to the animals – the animals are invariably killed – are very specific. If you’ve seen some of the bodies that I’ve seen, it”s just absolutely incredible.

    It”s plainly evident that these (attacks) are not carried out by natural predators.
    Mike Freebury

    “The flesh appears to have been cauterized indicating some sort of thermic lance or micro-sonic wand has been used. We”re talking incredible technology. There is never any blood.”

    No arrests

    Mike says they’re have been 40,000 estimated cases in America since the 1970s. The number in the UK remains unknown. “You do have to question – how is it that somebody has not been identified?” he said. “(How is it that) somebody has not been arrested or charged with these crimes? There’s never been a single prosecution. And it”s the same in this country. “It’s plainly evident that these (attacks) are not carried out by natural predators.”

    Project Corridor

    The APFU are currently conducting a survey called Project Corridor, an attempt to quantify the number of attacks in Shropshire. Mike explained: “(The attacks) are a crime. They”re a crime under the Criminal Damage Act. I would say to you that the farmers themselves seem to accept that not only is there a problem but in many cases they are describing what appear to be craft of unknown origin flying over their land and they are pointing the finger at them for carrying out these attacks.” Mike Freebury will be giving a lecture to the on Monday, 14 June at the Midlands Red Social Club.

    Story from BBC NEWS:
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/local/blackcountry/hi/tv_and_radio/newsid_8718000/8718028.stm

    Published: 2010/06/02 15:17:47 GMT


     

  • Human Mutilation

    Human Mutilation


    WARNING! WARNING! WARNING!

    The Bottom of this page contains VERY GRAPHIC PHOTOS of Brazilian HUMAN MUTILATION VICTIM! DO NOT PROCEED IF YOU ARE NOT PREPARED FOR THESE VERY SHOCKING PHOTOGRAPHS!

    There are 3 Human Mutilation Reports on this page.

    UFO-Related Homicide in Brazil: The Complete Story [from International UFO Magazine]

    By G. Cope Schellhorn

    If this case is authentically UFO-related – and at this time I have no reason to believe it is not – then all of us are going to have to reevaluate to one degree or another our tentative conclusions as to the possible specific intentions, moral perspectives and general agenda that some of our extraterrestrial visitors may have.

    There have been rumors of homicidal, UFO-related, human mutilation cases for some time now but hard evidence has been lacking. Until, perhaps, now. Brazilian ufologist Encarnacion Zapata Garcia and Dr. Rubens Goes have recently presented a series of sensational photographs, obtained from police files which mimic the wounds of countless UFO-related animal mutilation cases that have been reported in Europe and North, Central and South America since the 1960s. On first glance they would seem to be ufology’s worst nightmare.

    What is more disturbing is that Brazilian ufologists and
    police have intimated that there may be at least a dozen or
    more cases similar to the recently uncovered Guarapiranga
    reservoir case. If this is true, it is somewhat doubtful that
    any of this potential new material will ever see the light
    of day, given the official attitudes now prevailing in Western
    power circles. But we can be grateful for fortuitous disclosures,
    and the Guarapiranga case and it’s accompanying photographs
    seem to be just that. A great stroke of luck, albeit a dismaying
    one. Obviously if the Guarapiranga data is legitimate, then
    it becomes increasingly difficult to maintain the position
    that all visitors are demonstrating a relatively friendly
    attitude toward humans, regardless of what their specific
    agenda(s) may be. The Guarapiranga situation indicates that
    there is at least one group of alien visitors to the planet
    who have a complete disdain for human sensibilities, who,
    in fact, could care less about the value of human life.

    When I learned of the Guarapiranga case through Brazilian
    ufologist A.J. Gevaerd, who first published the related photos
    in his magazine UFO, my interest was stimulated and I quickly
    made plans for a trip to Brazil. In Sao Paulo I met Encarnacion
    Garcia at the home of well known ufologist Claudeir Covo and
    talked with her later at length. Then I traveled to Campo
    Grande and questioned Gevaerd. He was kind enough to supply
    me with second generation photographs (the best available)
    of the Guarapiranga reservoir victim having himself become
    thoroughly convinced that the evidence supporting the case
    was authentic and that the case was UFO-related. I came to
    the same conclusion because all other alternatives were neither
    supported by facts nor good logic, whereas the similarities
    to numerous cattle mutilations which I had studied in the
    United States were startling, exactly paralleling what I have
    seen many times before.

    The specifics of the case are as follows:

    Encarnacion Garcia learned from her friend, Dr. Rubens
    Goes, that he was in possession of some rather “odd” photos
    which had been given to him by his cousin, police technician,
    Rubens Sergio. These were official photos of a body that had
    been found near Guarapiranga reservoir on the 29th of September,
    1988, of an unnamed male who was, however, later identified.
    The name of this man has been withheld from all media investigators,
    including UFO investigators, at the request of his relatives.

    After studying the photos, Encarnacion Garcia was impressed
    with how similar the wounds of the body were to those found
    on the carcasses of so many UFO-related mutilated animals,
    knowledge which the original investigating police officials
    and medical doctors involved with the case did not possess.
    Surprisingly, Dr. Cuenca, head of the primary investigation,
    offered his files on the case. This is the stroke of luck
    which I previously mentioned and for which we can all be thankful.
    These included the all-. important autopsy description to
    which I will momentarily refer.

    The initial police report, however, was not extraordinary
    in nature except for the recognition that the body, although
    extremely mutilated, had not met with unusual violence; that
    is, there were no signs of struggle or the application of
    bondage of any kind.

    It was the autopsy report itself which was most revealing,
    especially when we compare the remarks made there with what
    we have learned from animal mutilation cases elsewhere. It
    is imperative to remember, as I have stated previously, that
    the individuals conducting the autopsy had no knowledge of
    similar animal mutilation cases. This makes the official remarks
    of the report all the more revealing in retrospect.

    Encarnacion Garcia received copies of seven photos. I
    have included the five most revealing ones here with a description
    and commentary. The work of the perpetrators of this atrocity:
    the kinds of cuts made, the precision of the cuts, the removal
    of whole internal organs through small apertures, the lack
    of bleeding, the failure of the body to smell or decompose
    rapidly – all these are hallmarks of UFO-related animal mutilations.
    These peculiarities would seem to rule out Satanists, revenge-
    seekers or casual mutilators and go beyond even the capacities
    of a modern Jack the Ripper.

    Photo #I: Face and upper torso photo. The body was in
    perfect condition. Rigor mortis had not set in and it was
    estimated that the victim had been killed approximately 48
    to 72 hours previously. There were no signs of animal predation
    or putrefaction which might be expected. Strangely, there
    was no odor to the cadaver. Bleeding from the wounds had been
    minimal. The black coloration found in the face area and in
    other places within the photo is partly due to low light exposure
    when this photo and others were taken. It is also partly due
    to coagulated blood in the wound areas.

    As can clearly be seen, flesh and lips have been excised
    around the mandibles, as is common in cattle and other animal
    mutilations, the autopsy report noted that “the eyes and ears
    were also removed and the mouth cavity was emptied.” Removal
    of these body parts, including the tongue as here, is common
    enough in animal mutilation cases.

    As Encarnacion Garcia rightly recognized, if a comparison
    of the victim with animal mutilation cases is made, “You can
    see they are the same – and that is also the conclusion of
    experienced doctors.” The doctors drew their conclusion only
    after they had been shown photographs of similar animal mutilation
    cases, cases with which they were not previously familiar.

    The autopsy report states: “There has been a removal of
    extensive tissue along many parts of the face, head and neck
    of the victim… There has also been extraction of ocular
    tissue, eyes, auditive internal and external organs (ears)
    and entire parts of the head. The tongue and several muscles
    were also extracted.”

    The kinds of cuts on the cadaver are what we have come
    to expect in UFO-related animal mutilation cases. Of primary
    interest is their precision. The “surgery” (or butchery, if
    you will) was done with agility and care and probably with
    speed. The lack of profuse bleeding suggests the use of a
    laser-like instrument producing acute heat, thus cauterizing
    almost immediately the edge of the wounds. This is a speculation
    on my part, however, although there are numerous precedents.
    Many of the cases studied by Dr. John Altshuler in the United
    States exhibit this kind of high heat, rapid surgery. Whether
    it would still be possible to test fragments of the flesh
    from the victim’s wound areas is doubtful. Suffice it to say
    the wounds appear to be exact replicas of cases studied by
    Dr. Altshuler, Tom Adams, Bob Pratt, Ted Oliphant, Linda Howe,
    Colman VonKeviczky and myself.

    Photo #2: (Above) Face and upper torso with arms outstretched.
    Perhaps it is best to begin here with several quotes from
    the autopsy report. “The axillary regions on both sides showed
    soft spots where organs had been removed. Incisions were made
    on the face, internal thorax, abdomen, legs, arms, and chest.”
    As Garcia observed, the doctors stated that these wounds were
    quite uncommon. The report also observes, “Shoulders and arms
    have perforations of 1 to 1.5 inches in diameter where tissue
    and muscles were extracted. The edges of the perforations
    were uniform and so was their size. The chest had shrunk due
    to the removal of internal organs.”

    In other words, internal organs were removed or sucked
    somehow through these small circular incisions. Why such a
    technique? Some doctors today are using a similar method to
    remove diseased tissue and organs from their human subjects
    – but this kind of procedure injures those organs in the process.
    Did the “surgeons” who worked on this victim care whether
    the organs were injured or not? What kind of specimens were
    they looking for? What kind of research is this? Wouldn’t
    it be easier and more medically expedient to abduct a human
    specimen and study it live, including its anatomy and physiology,
    in a properly equipped laboratory? It would appear that the
    perpetrators of this act did not care if the man’s life was
    lost nor did they care if the body were found. Here we have
    strong indication of a total disregard for the specimen and,
    by extension, for human life in general. The body was left
    as trash. What does this say about the perpetrators and their
    attitudes?

    The photo clearly shows the symmetrical holes in the man’s
    arms. One arm clearly shows the sunken area near the perforation
    clearly, demonstrating where muscle has been extracted. The
    shrunken chest area also indicates a similar process of internal
    extractions. It is significant that the police and medical
    examiners were convinced the holes found in the head, arms,
    stomach, anus and legs were not produced by bullet wounds.

    Photo #3: Close up of the left side of the victim’s head.
    Here we see that the ear is cleanly excised. As the report
    states, “auditive internal and external” matter was removed
    The photo does not show the small holes discovered in the
    cranium. These were detected, however, by the medical examiners.
    How much, if any, of the brain tissue was removed is not stated.

    Photo #4: Close up of lower torso including thighs. The
    stretcher, pants and cord that are visible belonged to the
    rescue team. The autopsy report continues, “You also find
    the removal of the belly button leaving a 1.5 inch hole in
    the abdomen and a depressed abdominal cavity showing the removal
    of the intestines.” Brazilian doctors who later viewed the
    evidence were left nonplused by the hole in the umbilical
    area where, it appeared, “a great amount of internal organs
    were extracted. The edge of the hole was perfect and shows
    a precision cut. Also, the abdominal area of the body was
    very shrunken because of organ removal.” The original autopsy
    report notes that “the scrotum was also removed by a 3 x 1.5
    cm. elliptical incision.” Strangely, the penis itself was
    left intact although it appeared to have been stretched to
    about twice its normal length. Why excise the scrotum without
    taking the penis? Human logic is defied by such actions. We
    are aware, however, of the great similarity here with other
    animal mutilation cases, particularly female cattle where
    it is not unusual to see anus, teats, vagina and uterus extracted.
    But why exactly this is done is as big a mystery as who the
    exact perpetrators are, although there is enough strong circumstantial
    evidence to implicate UFO involvement.

    The hole in the left leg duplicates in size the umbilical
    hole and the arm hole previously discussed. In the words of
    the autopsy report, “It was an… elliptical incision of about
    3 x 1. 5 cm…The penis was stretched and had no signs of
    being cut. The testicles were extracted with a precision cut.”
    Rather startling is the lack of pubic hair, as if the victim
    had been readied for surgery.

    Early on in the investigation, Brazilian official investigators
    considered the possibility that the castration of the victim
    was an act of revenge. They soon rejected this theory, however,
    because it could not account for the remaining wounds and
    the other peculiarities related to the body. What is more,
    revenge seekers who castrate usually excise the penis, not
    just the scrotum.

    Photo #5: Victim lying on his stomach. The autopsy report
    specifies: -“Removal of the anus and a hole between the second
    and third toes…The anal orifice of the victim was extracted
    with a large incision about 3 by 6 inches in diameter. The
    rectum and other internal parts of the human discharge system
    were also removed. It is probable that even some of the internal
    organs of the man could have been removed through this incision.”

    What is most compelling about the anal incision and the
    extraction of anal and digestive tract tissue is that it is
    a carbon copy of the surgery we have seen in so many UFO-related
    animal mutilation cases. Are we supposed to believe a revengeful
    human or a group of Satanists are capable of such precise,
    difficult, surgical techniques/procedures which leave even
    medical professionals perplexed as to how they could have
    been done? I think not. Has the Brazilian and/or American
    government staged a little demonstration at the Guarapiranga
    reservoir to frighten UFO investigators and the general public
    into fearing all extraterrestrial contact? In other words,
    are we faced with a gruesome, carefully orchestrated display
    of misinformation? Possibly, but probably not, and my reasons
    for believing this are several.

    First, it would seem a fortuitous turn of events that
    ufologist Encarnacion Zapata Garcia had the right friend(s)
    in the right places at the right time. If our government,
    and presumably the Brazilian government, has kept a lid on
    similarly sensational material in the past – and I have no
    doubt there is more than ample evidence supporting such a
    contention – here we have an accidental bubble that has, against
    all odds, escaped the pot. It is our good fortune, you might
    say.

    The photos are definitely causing a stir; causing many
    people, including some UFO investigators, to do some new thinking.
    But the powers that control lids will be carefully double-checking
    in the near future to make sure the pot is as secure as possible.
    Thus I would not get my hopes up that additional homicidal,
    UFO-related human mutilation cases and graphic photographs
    accompanying them will surface in the near future.

    If we discard the possibility of the Guarapiranga case
    as a piece of misinformation, we are left with several intriguing
    alternatives. Is this the infrequent act of a rogue extraterrestrial
    group which from time to time enjoys indulging themselves
    in a pathological blood sport at the expense of humans? Perhaps.
    More likely, I think, we are indirect witnesses to an intentionally
    contemptuous act by a group or species of extraterrestrial
    origin who would like to give other visiting species a bad
    name and, as a bonus, harness mankind into a greater fear-mentality
    than already binds it. But these are only speculations and
    we will have to wait until a future time for a greater truth
    when more thorough revelations, and evidence that supports
    them, become available.

    Do we have any precedents to the Guarapiranga case? Yes,
    we do. At least one good example and the rumors of possibly
    another. The case of Sgt. Jonathan P Louette, who was stationed
    at White Sands Missile Test Range in 1956 and whose mutilated
    body was found on the Range three days after an Air Force
    major had witnessed his abduction by a “disk shaped” object,
    bares a striking resemblance to the Guarapiranga situation.
    Louette’s genitals had been removed, his rectum cored out
    with surgical precision and his eyes excised in a manner quite
    similar to the incisions made upon our Guarapiranga victim.
    And then there is the rumor of the Texas mutilation case which
    occurred – and was quickly hushed up – in the mid ’60s. I
    have had verification ofthe legitimacy of this by two intelligence
    agency personnel, one active and one retired, but have not
    had time to investigate further.

    At present, the rumors of human body parts found on at
    least one crashed UFO in the 1940s, body parts found in a
    barn in the state of Oregon several years ago or the rumor
    of a mutilated Vietnam War B-52 crew will have to remain just
    that – rumors, until the lid accidentally, albeit infrequently,
    comes ajar again and we have some solid evidence. But there
    is no denying that the Guarapiranga reservoir case has taken
    us far beyond rumor. The evidence is unmistakable and it is
    sobering. On the one hand, it points stunningly in a UFO-related
    direction. On the other hand, I believe it would be wise of
    us to draw a tentative conclusion if other less violent cases
    have not already led us to do so. We should not, in most cases,
    generalize about our extraterrestrial visitors; neither about
    their motives , morals nor research agendas. And one addendum
    also seems advisable: In an age when almost anything has come
    to seem possible, if not probable, either cosmically or here
    on earth, the wisest course might be to let our extraterrestrial
    visitors demonstrate their friendliness before jumping to
    conclusions about their philanthropy and opening the door
    too wide. After all, Little Red Riding Hood, nine times out
    of ten, is no match for the wolf at the door.

    We have seen in the past, especially in Brazil, many cases
    where Human beings have been attacked by UFOs and their occupants.
    This is an undeniable reality that many researchers do not
    want to face. The Fenomeno Chupa-Chupa or “Suck-Suck” phenomenon
    which occurred in the Amazon and northeastern part of the
    country in the ’70s and ’80s produced hundreds of injured
    people and ultimately some fatalities. These mostly impoverished
    people were usually attacked by small probes (3-6 inches in
    diameter), probably unmanned, little UFOs which emitted strong,
    burning beams of light. Many of the victims suffered not only
    burns but a significant loss of blood (thus the “suck-suck”
    appellation) during their encounters. Some, such as Luiz Fernandes
    Barroso, suffered appreciable mental as well as physical incapacitation.
    Barroso’s mind was reduced to that of a two-year-old long
    before his death.

    In North America, reports of brutal manhandling by UFO
    occupants are much rarer. If homicidal, UFO-related human
    mutilations have taken place they have either gone unrecognized
    for what they really are or have been adeptly covered up by
    official intervention. Whatever the truth may be, the Guarapiranga
    reservoir case and the startling photos which accompany it
    should give us pause for thought. I, like ufologist editor
    A.J. Gevaerd, came to the conclusion after reviewing the evidence
    that UFO-related mutilators were most probably the perpetrators
    of the abominations revealed by the photographs of the Guarapiranga
    reservoir victim. And I believe Gevaerd is probably right
    when he says most extraterrestrial visitors seem neutral in
    their attitudes towards Earth and earth humans, some are friendly
    and some could care less. We had better learn, I think, to
    discern the differences. It might in the long run save our
    world culture and our very lives.

    [end]


    The Human Mutilation Factor

    by Don Ecker
    In the last forty years of UFO research,
    one of the most baffling questions that have plagued researchers
    has been “Is the UFO Phenomenon dangerous to humanity?” Over
    the years, there have been numerous cases where the phenomenon
    has figured into human deaths, but as a rule, most cases have
    been officially ruled accidental. When speaking of cases where
    death has resulted, usually most assume cases where military
    pilots have died as a result of “chasing” the phenomenon.
    One of the most famous of these military chases that is discussed
    when ever the subject of death and UFOs is raised, is the
    famous “Mantell Case”. This case is so well known that I will
    not discuss it here, but there are many others. In one of
    the less well known cases, during the mid 1950’s, a military
    jet interceptor was observed on radar being “absorbed” into
    a UFO over the Great Lakes. No trace of pilot or aircraft
    was ever found. In another case reported in the excellent
    work “Clear Intent” was the case of the “Cuban MIG Incident”.
    In this case a Cuban MIG was locking on his weapons radar
    when the aircraft exploded in mid*air. The wing man was certain
    that the UFO had fired some type of weapon, but other than
    the jet exploding, no other smoke, flame or other obvious
    weapon firing was observed.

    The matter of either overt or covert hostility on the
    part of UFOs has always been treated warily by serious researchers.
    On the one hand, if the enigma is hostile, then several questions
    must be faced. What if anything should the powers in authority
    tell the public? Is the government capable of handling a threat
    of this type? Is the public ready to face an issue as potentially
    terrifying as a “possible threat from somewhere else?” Other
    than incidents involving military involvement, have there
    been cases where civilians have been injured or killed during
    some type of UFO encounter? Is it possible that the reported
    cases of UFOs and their occupants abducting unwilling humans
    for some type of medical or genetic experimentation could
    be true? Now, if any of this is factual, then what ramifications
    do the Human Race face in light of the above?

    According to Mr. Phil Imbrogno, during the research that
    led to the writing of “NIGHT SIEGE The Hudson Valley UFO Sightings”
    by Dr. J. Allen Hynek, Philip Imbrogno, and Bob Pratt, Imbrogno
    has stated that on several occasions, Hynek specified that
    he wanted no mention of the dozens of human abductions that
    they had already uncovered at that time, to be mentioned in
    the book. Hynek was afraid of the adverse publicity if word
    of this aspect leaked out to the public. After Hyneks death,
    Imbrogno stated publicly on Compuserve and other public forums,
    facts of abductions, animal mutilations, and EVEN several
    cases of mysterious deaths of humans, that he indicated COULD
    possibly be linked to the UFO Phenomenon.

    While researching several stories for UFO Magazine, I
    interviewed a number of prominent UFOlogists, over the last
    several months, and in each case, the question of human deaths,
    in connection with animal mutilations, invariably was raised.
    Most readers of this text will be familiar with Mr. John Keel,
    who many regard as the last of the Great UFOlogists. From
    the earliest days of modern UFOlogy, Keel has been a force
    to reckon with. The author of numerous books that address
    various aspects of UFOlogy, and magazine articles too numerous
    to mention, Keel has a unique slant on the subject that most
    will never experience. According to Keel, the phenomenon has
    always had an unexplained hostility towards humans, that have
    led to untold numbers of deaths. While Keel will be the first
    to explain that he rejects the ET hypothesis, he does not
    doubt the phenomenon a bit. In what many UFOlogists consider
    as one of Keels best works “The Mothman Prophecies”, E. P.
    Dutton & Co., Inc. 1975, Keel related report after report
    of animal mutilations involving cattle, dogs, horses and sheep,
    and also related what were called “vampire killings” of four
    humans in Yugoslavia, where the victims were “mutilated and
    drained of blood”.

    After having spoken to John Ford, the Chairman of the
    Long Island UFO Network, for a news story for UFO Magazine,
    I became even more convinced that the aspect of potential
    UFO hostility should be investigated. Ford relayed a numbing
    number of animal mutilations, human disappearances, human
    abductions, covert Federal involvement in areas that suffered
    high numbers of animal mutilations, and even armed military
    helicopters that chased UFOs over civilian communities. Ford,
    who is an officer of the Federal Court system, did investigations
    into the disappearances of mostly young adults over a year
    period, in areas of high UFO overflights, and after having
    several personal friends who were police officers of the local
    municipalities look into the situation, came to the conclusion
    that the facts were being suppressed. The reason given was
    that there was “no need to panic the public.” Although no
    iron clad proof can be made for direct UFO intervention, the
    circumstances are extremely suspect.

    After growing up in an age where the entire human race
    can be decimated by nuclear, biological and chemical weapons,
    the human race somehow manages to keep slogging on. I have
    seen more people “panicked” over a shortage of gasoline than
    imminent nuclear holocaust, yet somehow when the subject of
    UFOs crop up, the government doesn’t want to panic anyone.
    It really makes me wonder what they know, that I should. I
    really don’t think that they are going to talk to anyone soon,
    as you shall soon see.

    In January, 1989, it came to the attention of the MUFON
    State Director of Idaho, Mr. Don Mason, that cattle mutilations
    had occurred once again in the southeastern section of Idaho.
    After an investigation by a MUFON investigator, the facts
    were as follows. The animals ( two cattle, same night, but
    each owned by different ranchers ) were “somehow” killed,
    sexual organs removed, body fluids drained, patches of hide
    “surgically” removed. All the appearances of what is today
    considered to be a classic case of animal mutilation. As of
    this date ( February 15, 1989 ) the final lab reports are
    not back yet, but already the Sheriffs Department has labeled
    it a “cult killing.” No tracks, tire or human, around the
    animals even though it had just rained, no unusual activity
    reported by the ranchers that evening, and one animal was
    found next to an occupied house. One of the ranchers admitted
    that this was the second time he had been “hit” by the mysterious
    mutilators. The last incident had only been a bit over a year
    previously, and they were worried enough that all had their
    “deer rifle” within easy reach.

    After having been personally involved in an investigation
    of cattle mutilations as a police officer back in 1982, I
    was very familiar with the “cult” theory of perpetrators.
    The Idaho Department of Law Enforcement drags it out every
    time there is a new rash of mutilations. The problem is, and
    every one is aware of it, that no one has yet been brought
    to trial, or arrested yet for these crimes. Out here in the
    west, people know that you are flirting with a ranchers bullet
    if you are caught fooling around with the ranchers cattle.
    They are his livelihood, and he will defend it. Yet, the mutilations
    keep occurring, and no one is any the wiser, or are they?

    With the subject of animal mutilations fresh in everyones
    mind, I was once again speaking to Don Mason, when he informed
    me that the investigator that had been assigned to the above
    mentioned case had come across a very mysterious death of
    a man back in 1979. According to the report, two hunters in
    the Bliss and Jerome area of Idaho had literally stumbled
    across the nude body of a man that had been hideously mutilated.
    The body was in the literal middle of nowhere, nude except
    for a pair of underpants, his sexual organs had been removed,
    his lips sliced off, and several other classic mutilation
    cuts. Although he was in very rugged country, his bare feet
    were not marked as if he had walked in that terrain, but yet
    no other tracks, animal or human were evident anywhere. After
    the police were notified, an intensive search was mounted,
    and miles away, the mans possessions were recovered, yet no
    one yet knows how the body ended up where it was found, or
    even more importantly, what happened to him. It should be
    noted that this area also had over the years, many unexplained
    UFO reports and cattle mutilations.

    Now I must explain that I had very mixed feelings about
    whether I wished to attempt to explore this subject any further,
    or allow sleeping dogs to lie. On the one hand, I wanted more
    than anything to discover just what was occurring, and on
    the other, I realized that this had the potential to backfire
    on someone that disturbed the status quo. I was familiar with
    reports of human abductions and mutilations that had surfaced
    in the last several years in reports such as the Lear documents,
    Grudge 13 reports and others, but yet I was not sure what
    I believed, or even if there was anything to believe. I ran
    across a friend that was still employed with a police department
    in this area who was a detective. I had mentioned to him the
    recent cattle mutilations, and what I suspected in the above
    mentioned case of a human that had been mutilated. Scot had
    also been involved in the last several years with several
    cases of mutilations that he had been called upon to investigate,
    always with negative results. He was as curious about this
    phenomenon as I was, and since he was still an active duty
    police officer, he had access to the department computer,
    to access the NCIC system that is maintained in Washington
    D. C. by the FBI{ext. link} . After giving Scot the criteria
    for a search of unexplained human deaths, that involved factors
    of mutilation, I asked that the search go back to at least
    1973, involving this area of the Northwest. Scot ( not his
    real name ) ran the request through the department computer.
    As he mentioned at the time, he had expected to get realms
    of reports back that we would have to wade through, to get
    to the reports that would be are further study. Scot ended
    up requesting that the inquiry be run back to 1970, and involve
    not only Idaho, but also Utah, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington
    states. Because of the magnitude of this search, Scot stated
    that it would take about one week to get the results back
    into his department. As a side note, for anyone that is not
    familiar with the NCIC system, it is a national data bank
    for Law enforcement agencies all across the United States.
    It is maintained and controlled by the Federal Burea of Investigation,
    at FBI headquarters, in Washington D. C.

    On the 14th of February, Scott contacted me in person,
    and appeared very troubled. His exact words were that “something
    is really screwy, Don.” “I got the request back from NCIC
    on Monday, and there has gotta be something wrong. They told
    me that they had NO unsolved murders at all, zero, that met
    that criteria. THAT ANY FURTHER REQUESTS WILL HAVE TO BE MADE
    BY VOICE, TELEPHONE CALL, WITH PROPER AUTHORIZATION. Somebody
    is sitting on something, big as Hell.” I also knew that something
    was as screwy as hell. After all, anybody that has had any
    dealing with law enforcement knows about the “Green River
    Killer” in Washington state. This serial killer is credited
    with at least 30 to 40 murders of young women, and to this
    date, the case is as big a mystery as ever. Many of the killings
    showed some types of mutilation, and if nothing else, at least
    some of these homicides should have shown up.

    Once more, as a side note, I had been warned by a prominent
    UFOlogist, that there was a lid “screwed down tighter than
    you would believe in regards to human mutes.” I also was warned
    that in order to break through the secrecy, was going to be
    a long and sometimes weary job, but that if enough persistence
    was applied, then it was possible to get to the bottom of
    this facet of the UFO enigma. Do I think that this can be
    solved, along with the rest of the puzzle? Yes, I do, because
    I think that the secrecy can only be maintained for so long,
    and then no longer. I also believe very strongly that only
    if the entire UFO community works in concert will this be
    accomplished, and the infighting and arguments MUST CEASE for the good of us all.

    On the ParaNet system and on Compuserve, I wrote and uploaded
    a file entitled LIGHT.TXT, and in UFO Magazine Vol. 3, No.
    5 I called for a UFO summit to be held in order to get the
    UFO community organized and to present a unified front. Only
    by a unified front, and calling for Congressional hearings,
    will this lid ever get torn off, and the truth that is suppressed
    be brought to the light of day. Any help from the members
    will be greatly appreciated, and I can be reached at ParaNet
    RHO at the following number: 1-208-338-9187 in the USA.

    Also I can be reached on Compuserve by EMail, and my user
    number is: 74270,3360. Anyone with ANY INFORMATION is requested
    to contact me at the above addresses as soon as possible.
    The secrecy game has gone on long enough. It is past time
    to get to the bottom of this. Forty years IS LONG ENOUGH.

    Don Ecker The Secrecy Game


    by: Tim Swartz

    Copyright ©1997 Tim Swartz

    Are UFOs responsible for mysterious human mutilations?
    Researchers of the UFO phenomenon have openly speculated over the years that if UFOs do represent extraterrestrial
    visitors, why do they operate in such secrecy? Alleged
    UFO contactees say that the aliens are friendly and are
    here to help mankind. However, evidence that extraterrestrials
    have a sinister, hidden agenda when dealing with Earth’s
    inhabitants tells a different story. The most obvious
    example of nefarious UFO activity has to be the mutilation
    of cattle. The evidence is mostly anecdotal that UFOs
    are involved with cattle mutilations, but the unusual
    circumstances surrounding this mystery seem to point to
    UFOs, or at least UFO-like activity.

    Over the years, strange attacks on animals and humans
    have been recorded and attributed to predators, other
    humans and even vampires. What makes these incidents similar
    is the general lack of blood found on the bodies. Primitive
    man believed that blood was sacred, the source of life
    in all creatures. When you lost your blood, you lost your
    life. So it made sense that the life force must be contained
    in blood. The Old Testament is a good example of ancient
    beliefs regarding blood. Leviticus 17:14 states, that
    “the life of every living creature is its blood.” The
    verse goes on to say that it is forbidden for anyone to
    eat blood because it is the source of all life.

    Because of these early beliefs, man has always had
    a superstitious horror when dealing with unusual attacks
    that involve the loss of blood. Throughout history, there
    have been numerous reports of strange attacks and mutilations
    that seem to go beyond normal animal predators. In 1874
    near Cavan, Ireland, for several months something killed
    as many as thirty sheep a night, biting their throats
    and draining the blood. In 1905 at Great Badminton, Avon,
    sheep were again the target for attacks. A police sergeant
    in Gloucestershire was quoted in the London Daily Mail,
    “I have seen two of the carcasses myself and can say definitely
    that it is impossible for it to be the work of a dog.
    Dogs are not vampires, and do not suck the blood of a
    sheep, and leave the flesh almost untouched.” In a single
    night in March of 1906, near the town of Guildford, Great
    Britain, fifty-one sheep were killed when their blood
    was drained from bite wounds to the throats. Local residents
    formed posses to hunt down whatever was killing their
    livestock, but nothing was ever caught, and the killings
    remain a mystery. Events of this kind have probably occurred
    regularly throughout history. The cases that have received
    media attention, are those involving a large number of
    deaths, but there are probably hundreds of smaller attacks
    that have gone unnoticed over the years.

    These strange livestock attacks are eerily similar
    to the recent attacks by the so-called Chupacabra, which
    means “goat sucker.” Confining itself chiefly to the southern
    hemisphere, the Chupacabra has been blamed for numerous
    attacks on small animals. The animals have had their throats
    bitten and their blood sucked out by the creature that
    reportedly stands on two legs, has large black or red
    eyes and is about four feet tall. Unlike past killings,
    the Chupacabra has been seen by shocked eyewitnesses whose
    descriptions seem to describe an animal that superficially
    resembles the “Grays” of flying saucer lore. As in past
    cases, attempts to track down the Chupacabra has met with
    failure. If history is any indication, the Chupacabra
    will never be caught, and the strange events will remain
    a mystery. It is as if the mystery mutilators appear out
    of thin air, do their damage, and then, just as quickly,
    disappear again.

    The mutilation of cattle seems to involve a different
    set of circumstances then past vampire-like attacks on
    livestock. While cattle mutilations almost always involve
    the complete draining of blood, physical mutilation of
    the flesh is so apparent that seasoned ranchers are shocked
    by the unusual nature of the deaths. No one really knows
    when the first unusual cattle mutilations began. Records
    show that in the middle of 1963, a series of livestock
    attacks occurred in Haskell County, Texas. In a typical
    case, an Angus bull was found with its throat slashed
    and a saucer-sized wound in its stomach. The attacks were
    attributed to a wild beast of some sort, a “vanishing
    varmint.” As the attacks continued through the Haskell
    County area, the unknown attacker assumed mythic proportions
    and a new name was created, “The Haskell Rascal.” Whatever
    was responsible for the mutilations was never caught,
    and the attacks slowly stopped. Throughout the following
    decade though, there would be similar reports of attacks
    on livestock. The most prominent of these infrequent reports
    was the mutilation death of a horse named Lady, in 1967.
    Area residents of southern Colorado reported UFO activity
    the night before Lady was found dead, and the consensus
    was that the unknown craft were somehow responsible.

    In 1973 the modern cattle mutilation wave can be said
    to have begun in earnest. It is interesting to note that
    a huge UFO flap was occurring across the country in 1973,
    with many sightings taking place in the same areas that
    cattle mutilations were happening. In November of 1974,
    rumors began to connect the sighting of UFOs with mutilated
    cows that were being found in large numbers in various
    Minnesota counties. Dozens of UFOs were reported in Minnesota
    and dozens of cattle were found dead and mutilated. Although
    the sightings and mutilations were never correlated, many
    felt that the number of sightings was added proof that
    the UFOs were somehow involved.

    In 1975, an unprecedented onslaught of strange deaths
    spread across the western two-thirds of the United States.
    Mutilation reports peaked in that year, accompanied by
    accounts of UFOs and unidentified helicopters. By 1979,
    numerous livestock mutilations were also being reported
    in Canada, primarily in Alberta and Saskatchewan. In 1980,
    there was an increase in activity in the United States.
    Mutilations have been reported less frequently since that
    year, though this may be due in part to an increased reluctance
    to report mutilations on the part of ranchers and farmers.
    In the 1990’s the mutilations have continued. In the United
    States, over ten thousand animals have reportedly died
    under unusual circumstances.

    Because of the strange nature of the killings, wild
    stories and rumors have surfaced over the years in an
    attempt to explain what is really going on. Chief among
    these are stories that aliens are harvesting cattle at
    night for their evil purposes. The extraterrestrials’
    preoccupation with cattle is apparently due to the fact
    that the ET’s absorb nutrients through the skin. The blood
    that they acquire from the cattle is mixed with hydrogen
    peroxide, which kills the foreign bacteria in the mixture,
    and is “painted” on their skin, allowing absorption of
    the required nutrients. Supposedly human blood is preferred
    by the aliens, but cattle blood can be altered to serve
    the same purpose.

    While it may seem far-fetched that animal blood could
    be used in place of human blood, recent scientific discoveries
    seem to confirm that animal blood can be altered for human
    transfusions. According to The Observer, a respected weekly
    paper in Great Britain. The scientists who helped engineer
    the first cloned sheep are reportedly close to generating
    human blood plasma from animals. PPL Therapeutics, the
    Scottish firm that helped Edinburgh’s Roslin Institute
    clone a sheep, is developing the means to replace the
    plasma genes of sheep and cows with the human equivalent.
    PPL told the paper it plans to raise herds of the animals
    and manufacture plasma from the proteins extracted from
    the animals. The Observer quoted Dr. Ron James, the firm’s
    managing director, as saying. ” Only 5 percent of Britain’s
    population regularly gives blood. Genetically modified
    animals could produce 10,000 times more plasma a year
    than a human donor.”

    In 1991 DNX Corp., a Princeton-based biotechnology
    firm, announced that it had developed genetically engineered,
    transgenic pigs that produce large quantities of recombinant
    human hemoglobin. When commercialized, DNX’s blood substitute
    could provide a cost-effective, virtually unlimited alternative
    to the human blood supply that is entirely free from the
    threat of contamination by infectious agents that cause
    diseases such as AIDS and hepatitis. In addition, DNX’s
    recombinant hemoglobin-based transfusion product will
    be universally compatible with all blood types, eliminating
    the need for blood typing and cross matching, and will
    have improved shelf-life and storage characteristics.
    DNX’s announcement was made to the 1991 World Congress
    on Cell and Tissue Culture in Anaheim, Calif., by John
    Logan, vice president of research at DNX. Perhaps the
    wild stories are not so far-fetched after all.

    If the stories are true, some would ask why aren’t
    the aliens catching and mutilating humans instead of animals?
    The truth could be that human mutilations and deaths are
    occurring on a regular basis, but that the stories are
    too horrible to contemplate. If murderous, UFO-related
    human mutilations have taken place, they have either gone
    unrecognized for what they really are, or have been adeptly
    covered up by official intervention. Thousands of people
    worldwide disappear every year, never to be seen again.
    A majority of these disappearances can be attributed to
    homicides or other more comman situations.

    However, some disappearances are so unusual and unexplained
    that more disturbing scenarios must be examined. In 1956
    at the White Sands Missile Test Range, an Air Force major
    reported that he had witnessed a disk shaped flying object
    kidnap Sgt. Jonathan P. Louette. Louette was missing for
    three days when his mutilated body was found in the dessert
    near the test range. Louette’s genitals had been removed
    and his rectum cored out with surgical precision. Like
    many cattle mutilations, Louette’s eyes had been removed
    and all of his blood was missing. The Air Force filed
    a report stating that Sgt. Louette had died of exposure
    after being lost in the dessert.

    The late Leonard H. Stringfield, a former Air Force
    intelligence officer wrote in his self-published book,
    UFO Crash/Retrievals, Status Report No. 6, about the testimony
    given by a “high ranking Army officer” whom Stringfield
    says he has known for several years and who is allegedly
    a “straight shooter.” The officer claimed that while he
    was in Cambodia during the Vietnam war, his Special Operations
    group was involved in a fire fight with aliens, whom the
    soldiers came across sorting human body parts and sealing
    them into large bins. Subsequently the unit was held for
    several days and interrogated under hypnosis. The officer
    claimed that he and his men were given cover memories
    which only began to surface years later. The implications
    here are staggering. If this story is true, then the possibility
    exists that military and government officials are aware
    of the aliens interests in the physiological makeup of
    the human body.

    In 1989, the mysterious death of a man a decade earlier
    came to the attention of the MUFON State Director of Idaho,
    Don Mason. According to the report, in 1979, two hunters
    in the Bliss and Jerome area of Idaho stumbled across
    the almost nude body of a man that had been hideously
    mutilated. The body’s sexual organs had been removed,
    it’s lips were sliced off, and the blood had been drained.
    Although the body was found in very rugged country, it’s
    bare feet were not marked, and no other tracks, animal
    or human were evident. After the police were notified,
    an intensive search was mounted and the man’s possessions
    were recovered miles from where the body was found. No
    one knows how the body ended up where it was found, or
    even more importantly, what happened to him. It should
    be noted that this area over the years, has had many unexplained
    UFO reports and cattle mutilations.

    In Westchester county New York, in 1988, several morgues
    were broken into late at night. Fresh human bodies had
    undergone mutilations involving partial removal of the
    face and total removal of the eyes, stomach, thyroid gland
    and genitals. An assistant medical examiner who had broken
    the silence concerning the case, stated that checks were
    immediately run on the employees who were on duty at the
    morgues. No links connecting morgue employees with the
    crimes were found. While there is no evidence that UFOs
    were responsible for the bizarre incidents, once again
    we see human bodies being mutilated in the same ways that
    cattle and other animals are being mutilated.

    Another interesting case that has received little
    publicity in the United States is the Brazilian Guarapiranga
    reservoir case. Brazilian ufologist Encarnacion Zapata
    Garcia and Dr. Rubens Goes uncovered a series of sensational
    photographs obtained from police files. The photos are
    of a dead man whose injuries are similar to the wounds
    of countless UFO-related animal mutilation cases. The
    body had been found near Guarapiranga reservoir on September
    29, 1988. The name of the man has been withheld from the
    media and UFO investigators at the request of his relatives.
    After studying the photos, Encarnacion Garcia was impressed
    with how similar the wounds of the body were to those
    found on the carcasses of so many mutilated animals. The
    initial police report noted that the body, although extremely
    mutilated, showed no signs of struggle or the application
    of bondage of any kind.

    The body appeared to be in good condition. Rigor mortis
    had not set in and it was estimated that the victim had
    been killed approximately 48 to 72 hours previously. There
    were no signs of animal predation or decay which might
    be expected. Strangely, there was no odor to the body.
    Bleeding from the wounds had been minimal. In fact, it
    was noted that there was a general lack of blood found
    in the body or on the ground around the body. Police photos
    show that the flesh and lips had been removed from around
    the mouth, as is common in cattle and other animal mutilations.
    An autopsy report stated that “the eyes and ears were
    also removed and the mouth cavity was emptied.” Removal
    of these body parts, including the tongue as here, is
    common enough in animal mutilation cases.

    The “surgery” appeared to have been done by someone
    familiar with surgical procedures. The lack of profuse
    bleeding suggested the use of a laser-like instrument
    producing heat, thus immediately cauterizing the edge
    of the wounds. The autopsy report states that, “The axillary
    regions on both sides showed soft spots where organs had
    been removed. Incisions were made on the face, internal
    thorax, abdomen, legs, arms, and chest. Shoulders and
    arms have perforations of 1 to 1.5 inches in diameter
    where tissue and muscles were extracted. The edges of
    the perforations were uniform and so was their size. The
    chest had shrunk due to the removal of internal organs.”
    The autopsy report continues, “You also find the removal
    of the belly button leaving a 1.5 inch hole in the abdomen
    and a depressed abdominal cavity showing the removal of
    the intestines.” The report also noted the victims scrotum
    had been removed, and that the anal orifice had been extracted
    with a large incision about 3 to 6 inches in diameter.

    It is significant that the police and medical examiners
    were convinced the holes found in the head, arms, stomach,
    anus and legs were not produced by bullet wounds. What
    is most disturbing about the anal incision and the extraction
    of anal and digestive tract tissue is that it is a carbon
    copy of the surgery seen in so many UFO-related animal
    mutilation cases. While no evidence linking the Guarapiranga
    reservoir mutilation case with UFOs has been found, Brazilian
    ufologists and police have hinted that there may be at
    least a dozen or more cases similar to this one. In fact,
    Brazil has had past incidents where UFOs have reportedly
    attacked people, and possibly taking blood from them.
    The July 12, 1977 edition of the JORNAL DA BAHIA reported
    that, “A fantastic story of a flying object emitting a
    strong light and sucking blood from people, circulated
    from mouth to mouth among the population of the counties
    of Braganca, Vizeu and Augusto Correa in Para’, where
    many people fear leaving their homes during the night
    so they won’t get caught by the vampire-like light from
    the strange object which, according to information, already
    has caused the death of two men. No one knows how the
    story started, but the truth is that it reached Bele’m
    and grabbed headlines in the local newspapers.”

    Months later, on October 8, the newspaper O LIBERAL
    launched the first in a series of reports, about the Chupa-Chupa
    (suck-suck) phenomenon. “Sucking animal attacks men and
    women in the village of Vigia: A strange phenomenon has
    been occurring for several weeks in the village of Vigia,
    more exactly in the Vila Santo Antonio do Imbituba about
    7 kilometers from highway PA-140, with the appearance
    of an object which focus a white light over people, immobilizing
    them for around an hour, and sucks the breasts of the
    women leaving them bleeding. The object, known by the
    locals as “Bicho Voador” (Flying Animal), or “Bicho Sugador”
    (Sucking Animal), has the shape of a rounded ship and
    attacks people in isolation. One of the victims, among
    many in the area, was Mrs. Rosita Ferreira, married, 46
    years old, resident of Ramal do Triunfo, who a few days
    ago was sucked by the light on the left breast, and passed
    out. Increasingly it looked like she was dealing with
    a nightmare, feeling as if there were some claws trying
    to hold her. She was attacked around 3:30 in the morning.
    Another victim was the lady known as “Chiquita,” who was
    also sucked by the strange object with her breast becoming
    bloody, but without leaving any marks.”

    Compared to reports of mysterious animal attacks and mutilations, reports involving humans are somewhat rare. The probable reason is that many such incidents involving people are not recognized for what they are. The possibility is that a massive cover-up by officials world-wide exists to hide the fact that something is preying on humans. If we consider that extraterrestrials are visiting Earth, the likely reason for such visitations is scientific exploration.
    Consider that with billions of galaxies and the likelihood that there are multitudes of different kinds of life scattered across the universe, the Earth is just another source of specimens for extraterrestrial scientists to gather and study. While man’s ego would like to think that we are special in the universe, the hard reality could be that we are just curiosities to be collected, studied, and possibly exploited, and then finally pickled in a jar someplace with the notation: HUMAN, MOSTLY HARMLESS.


    These are the photos from the Brazilian Human Mutilation Case – Again, WARNING – GRAPHIC!!!

    The complete set of the forensic color photographs, and the autopsy report, proves that the typical “cattle mutilation” type of wounds were inflicted WHILE THE VICTIM WAS ALIVE AND CONSCIOUS!

    It is a horrible fact that, due to its implications, must be divulged in spite of the shocking spectacle presented by the photos.

    Mauro Porto mfpporto@unisys.com.br

    Source for Brazilian Human Mutilation Story and Photos: The Cosmic Frontier


     

  • 1997: Florida Cattle Under Attack

    1997: Florida Cattle Under Attack


    by Shirley Parrish

    Florida officially joined the ranks of the cattle mutilation mystery when, on March 28, 1997, the State of Florida formed a task force to investigate the macabre wounds that have been left on the carcasses of more than 20 head of cattle in the central part of the state. According to Florida Today, a Brevard county newspaper, Brevard, Seminole, Lake and St. Lucie counties have all been hit with cattle mutilations since July, 1996. None of the usual suspects, writer Billy Cox of Florida Today states – UFOs, satanic cults and unmarked black helicopters – have ever been apprehended.

    A $1,000 reward, offered by the Florida Cattlemen’s Association for the arrest and conviction of the killers, remains unclaimed. A sheriff who has been investigating similar events in Colorado since the 1970s said, “I’ll be on the first jet down” as soon as an arrest is made. The April issue of The Florida Cattleman magazine warned ranchers not to handle mutilated cattle because “unknown persons have been poisoning (them).” That theory is offered somewhat lamely in order to avoid jeopardizing the investigation, according to the newspaper.

    Eyewitnesses sometimes report unidentified lights in the night skies near areas where mutilated cattle are later found. Linda Moulton Howe, who has been investigating such animal mutilations for more than twenty years, reports that the cattle typically leave few signs of struggle; microscopic analysis of bovine tissue and grasses found near the animals sometimes show cellular alterations consistent with exposure to microwave radiation which indicates advanced technology. Ms. Howe investigated more than 200 cattle mutilations over an 18-month period in two Colorado counties and from that investigation created her Emmy-award winning documentary, Strange Harvest. She has also written two books on as many as 10,000 mutilations, which have occurred in every state in the union and are now “a worldwide phenomenon.”

    Lt. Buck DeCoteau of the Palm Bay Police Department has investigated animal deaths caused by satanic cultists or “alternative religion” practitioners. “They’re constantly killing chickens, goats and pigs,” he says, “but cattle in the middle of a pasture – that’s news to me. Cattle are hard to handle. They’re big and bulky and they can’t be easily transported.”

    By February, 1997, five Brevard county cattle had been mutilated in the manner so familiar to those who have followed this phenomenon: missing tongues, eyes, ears, udders, anuses and genitalia. Organs which have been extracted through circular holes show little or no evidence of bleeding, indicating surgical procedures may have been performed by a laser-like instrument or some other very sharp scalpel.

    However, after his retirement from the FBI, Ken Rommel, of Santa Fe, New Mexico, conducted his own investigation of the mysterious cattle deaths. In 1980 he released his report titled “Operation Animal Mutilation: Report of the District Attorney [whose office funded the report], First Judicial District, State of New Mexico.” Mr. Rommel concluded his report by stating that “natural factors explain the mutilations.”

    (Thus, we are all reassured that we need not fear that “something out there” is killing cattle all over the planet in a mysterious manner, and that these deaths are from entirely explicable natural causes. Therefore, we can sleep at night without fear that “something” is causing uncontrolled loss of our resources. Right?)

    Mr. Rommel emphatically stated that such mutilation reports are “garbage” and “a media story.” His explanation is that cows die all the time from aging, disease, lightning, or ingesting poisonous plants. Their bodies are frequently predated upon by birds that “eat away at the soft tissue.” Ravenous blowflies are hungry enough to make even tongues disappear, he asserts, and post-mortem expansion of internal gases can literally blow holes through soft bovine bellies. These explosive gases undoubtedly, he continues, cause the serrated edges around the holes. Lack of blood can be attributed to pooling and drying long before discovery of the carcass. Birds and blowflies, of course, leave no tracks, which explains why none are found near the dead cattle.

    “People who lead dull and boring lives like to fantasize about things they don’t understand,” he said.

    Billy Kempfer, a Melbourne rancher, strongly disagreed with Mr. Rommel. “There’s something very weird going on here. Whoever is doing this is making very, very precise cuts with a scalpel or some other very sharp instrument. Buzzards do not remove a tongue at its base. Buzzards do not remove ears,” he said after he had talked to a rancher who discovered one of his cows while the carcass was still warm. “That guy (Rommel) is full of (it),” Billy snorted.

    Many of the cattle are found with every bone in their body broken, as if they had been dropped from a considerable height. Some of the ranchers have reported seeing black, noiseless “helicopters” with opaque windows before or after the site where cattle have later been found mutilated on their property. One cowboy fired his shotgun at a helicopter that touched down in a pasture; the mutilations stopped on that ranch.

    Recently, Linda Moulton Howe had developed a protocol to have ranchers send grass samples to W.C. Levengood in Grass Lake, Michigan for evaluation. Semi-retired and a former faculty member of the University of Michigan’s Institute of Science and Technology, his research on grains affected inside crop circles has been published in two peer review science journals. Ninety percent of the grass samples that he’s studied that have been gathered from mutilation sites show significant alterations in the mitochondria, the rod-like structures that regulate plant respiration. The closer the grass was to the animal, the more profound the changes.

    Prominent Colorado pathologist John Altshuler, who has biopsied bovine tissue, dislikes the term “mutilation,” because he says that word “implies random ripping and tearing. That’s obviously not what’s going on here,” he says. “I call them bovine excision sites. There’s a precision at work here.” He reports in Linda Moulton Howe’s book “Glimpses of Other Realities” that “vacuolar changes . . . result from tissue cooking or exposure to high temperatures probably above 300 degrees F.” He continues, “Taking all the microscopic findings into account, one would have to conclude that the surgical procedure performed on these animals took place quickly, probably in a minute or two, and utilized high temperature heat (e.g., laser) as a cutting source applied on a fine probe or cutting instrument.”

    The “No Trespassing” signs posted by area ranchers have failed to keep their cattle safe. Nothing in any other state has worked, either, except for the cowboy who took pot shots at the “helicopter.” The reward offered by the Florida Cattlemen’s Association has produced no claimants; the cattle continue to die by “unknown” means. The “experts” – some in one camp, others in an opposite camp – continue to huff and puff at each other and at the public. There seem to be no answers to the grisly deaths, nor remedies. Those who investigate want “more evidence” before making statements. Many investigators have given up and given in to new positions that don’t tolerate such “far out” activities.

    Where does that leave the security of the rest of us?


     

  • Cattle Mutilations

    Cattle Mutilations


    A world-wide problem, cattle are killed and the body is left on the farm in various conditions. On studying the body, it has been found that the body has been totally drained of blood and that there has been no trace of blood found anywhere on the ground around the body. Various incisions would also be found on the body that were so clear cut that they would have had to have been done with some sort of laser technology that we didn’t have when the mutilations started (before 1970). Bones were also clearly cut with no bone fragments around the cut. The bodies would be missing various parts which had also shown to have been removed with accurate precision. UFOs have been linked with these mutilations since they have been sighted at the same time in the same area where the mutilated bodies have been found.

    Mutilations are differentiated from accidental or predatory death for several reasons. Chief among them is the manner in which the flesh has been removed from the body. Cauterization (the fusing of tissue and blood vessels by heat or chemical means) seems to be typical of mutilations. Unlike animal attack, the flesh, adjoining the area where it has been removed, is smooth and clean as if cut with a searing or laser scalpel. As well, the areas chosen for removal are quite strange. Mainly the sexual, anterior digestive tract and sensory organs are affected.(No predator differentiates so precisely). Still, no tracks of any kind can be found around the mutilation site, except, sometimes, tripod marks. Also, no carrion eaters will touch the mutilated cow even though it has plenty of flesh still left to be eaten.

    Colorado, Wyoming, Texas, Alabama, Puerto Rico, Canada, and as far away as South America, have been home to such mutilations. Speculation that it is the work of secret US government groups (paramilitary or spy)or Satanic cults therefore seem too far fetched. Surely the US government would have their own stock of cows for an experiment of this nature. Satanic cults would need to have enormous resources to carry out this type of operation throughout the world. Ranchers have witnessed strange, unmarked black helicopters fly over their herds where they will later find mutilated cattle. Some have even witnessed strange lights in the night sky previous to finding bodies. There are those who believe that the mutilations are occurring as a random radiation test by extraterrestrial visitors whose purpose is to safeguard humanity against nuclear annihilation.

    Rancher C. E. Potts found one of his prize bulls alongside of the road one summer afternoon in 1990 ,late July. “We were passing down this road, and there was a thunderstorm a coming up behind us. We smelled this animal as we come by. We came back to check on it, and found it was mutilated. We examined it and its sexual organs was taken out. Its eyes were taken out, and its eyelashes were taken out. Well, there wasn’t no predators.

    Not a predator bothered it since it was dead even. Couldn’t have been killed by a predator cause all the surgical work was done by an expert. I really didn’t think anything of it till it come home to me. 

    Now I know it was bound to have been mutilated cause anyone who could see good could tell it was, Mr. Potts remembered.


     

  • 2013: Cattle mutilations back Ranchers, lawmen baffled by crime wave

    2013: Cattle mutilations back Ranchers, lawmen baffled by crime wave


    By KATIE OYAN
    Tribune Staff Writer


    CONRAD — This is the kind of déja vu Everett King could do without.
    About 15 years ago, he discovered the grisly remains of one of his cattle that had died mysteriously.

    In October, it happened again.

    King said it looked as though a surgeon had sliced into his 7-year-old Charolais, the way its right eye and ear were cut off — not to mention the way its reproductive organs had been cored. What King finds most unusual, however, is that two months later the carcass lies right where he found it, untouched. “Predators won’t eat it,” said King, who ranches outside Valier, south of Lake Frances. “It should have been cleaned up and gone a long time ago.”

    Ranchers reported four mutilations between June and August. Since then, there have been 11 more, and investigators are still searching for answers. The same bizarre circumstances haunted area ranchers and baffled law enforcement 20 years ago, sparking rumors about UFOs, cults and government conspiracies.

    The mutilations went away in the ’90s but began again this summer.

    The most recent victim — a 12-year-old Hereford — turned up earlier this month on a ranch northwest of Conrad. “They skinned off the belly from her front legs to her back legs all the way around,” Pondera County Sheriff’s Deputy Dan Campbell said. “The complete bag was removed.”

    The last few mutilations occurred within three miles of each other in the Dry Forks area, about 10 or 15 miles west of Conrad. In October, members of the New Miami Colony, 18 miles west of Conrad, discovered two mutilated cows at the same time, about 30 yards apart.

    The scenes were remarkably similar to mutilations ranchers reported here more than a decade ago, Campbell said.

    Most of the cows had the skin scraped off their faces. Often, the tongue, one eye and all or part of an ear had been removed. Part of the udder usually was cut off, as well as the genitals. And in most cases, the anus had been cored.

    A majority of the cows were 4 or 5; one was missing its teeth.

    In the late ’70s, a high volume of alleged mutilations in southwestern states prompted a federally funded investigation. The resulting 300-page report concluded that animal predators were responsible.

    Although some dismiss the Pondera County deaths as a hoax or chalk them up to natural causes and predators, Campbell and fellow investigator Sheriff’s Deputy Dick Dailey say they aren’t convinced. Cuts on the cows are often circular or oval and — as with Everett King’s Charolais — seem to be made with surgical precision.

    The animals seem to bloat faster than normal, and their missing hide doesn’t reflect the work of predators, Campbell said.

    “I’ve never seen an animal eat just the face off a cow when there’s lots of other stuff to go after,” he said.

    One mutilated cow looked like it had been burned. Another seemed to have bruises around its neck as though it had been strangled. One had a long cut with a perfectly ridged edge, as though the hide had been sliced with a tool similar to pinking shears.

    Also strange is that in most cases, no tracks or footprints were detected around the animals’ bodies, even in mud or snow.

    A misconception is that the cows have been drained of blood. Natural coagulation only makes it look like the creatures’ fluids have been drained, Dailey said.

    Dailey, who lives in Dupuyer, spent several nights this fall camped out in dark fields, trying to catch the culprit in the act. He has reviewed all the facts and checked out dozens of Web sites looking for answers.

    Still, nothing.

    “I’ve read everything I can read on it, and I really don’t know what in the heck it is,” he said.

    Ranchers aren’t sure what to think, either.

    In September, Jim VandenBos discovered the body of one of his $850 2-year-old Angus lying dead in his pasture.

    The right side of its face was skinned, and the exposed jawbone was so smooth it looked like it had been polished, VandenBos said.

    Its tongue was cut off along with its right ear, eye and reproductive organs. A tennis-ball-sized patch of skin on its shoulder was hard like plastic.

    Again, coyotes — even other cattle — steered clear.

    VandenBos has been ranching southwest of Valier for more than 30 years and remembers the last wave of mutilations well.

    “It’s kind of a spooky thing,” he said. “I haven’t worried about it too much because it’s something I can’t control – but I’d like to find an explanation.”

    Toward the end of October, a neighbor found the 750-pound steer that died in Glen and Ruby Bouma’s dry creek bed, three miles west of Conrad.

    “There was a little trail of grass pushed up like it was shoved up underneath it,” Ruby Bouma said.

    The hide was missing from the calf’s stomach and its reproductive organs were gone, but there were no tracks, no bullet holes and no claw marks.

    The calf, No. 55, was almost a year old and was worth about $600. It was one of the friendliest animals the Boumas owned.

    A local vet said it died of dust pneumonia, but Glen and Ruby have their doubts.

    “That’s possible, because it’s so dry,” Ruby Bouma said. “But I think we would have known if it was sick. We took special notice because it was one of two calves that were like pets to us. It would come up and smell your hand or your pantleg.”

    The whole thing is peculiar, if you ask the Boumas. When a cow dies of natural causes, for instance, predators will usually chew into its flesh.

    Glen and Ruby’s calf was missing only its hide. And when they checked on Thanksgiving Day, predators still were keeping their distance.

    Some folks in the area think the U.S. Air Force or aliens are behind the mutilations, but not Ruby.

    “I’m sorry, but I personally think it’s somebody local … that’s doing it for kicks,” she said.

    One difficulty local investigators have encountered in cracking the case is gathering evidence.

    After two or three days, collecting evidence becomes a lost cause because the cattle are so badly decomposed.

    And in the summer, carcasses rot faster and often go undiscovered for weeks.

    “We have to fight time,” Campbell said. “We’re hoping that this time of year, ranchers are gathering and feeding every day so we’ll get a better jump on them and come up with some more clues.”

    Pondera sheriff’s deputies also are hoping a Nevada laboratory will answer some of their questions.

    This fall, Campbell and Dailey chopped the head off a mutilated cow, packed it in dry ice and shipped it to the National Institute for Discovery Science in Las Vegas.

    The privately funded institute pays scientists and retired police officers to investigate bizarre phenomena including mutilations and UFO sightings.

    A spokesman from the institute said researchers are nearly finished with their study and will be sending a copy of the report to the Pondera County sheriff’s office in a couple of weeks.

    “If they could come up with something, that would really help us,” Dailey said.

    Until investigators reach a satisfactory conclusion, theories continue to spread through local coffee shops and bars.

    Some say the mutilations are a government ploy to get Montanans’ minds off global issues. Others finger satanic cults or spaceships.

    Most say they don’t believe in all that eerie X-Files stuff. But even some of the staunchest skeptics are beginning to wonder.

    “I just can’t believe little men are coming from outer space,” said Conrad resident Jack Rowekamp, a retired bus driver and custodian. “But I guess you never know.”